<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Instrument Rating - unofficial ground school</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fearoflanding.com/flying/instrument-rating-unofficial-ground-school/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fearoflanding.com/flying/instrument-rating-unofficial-ground-school/</link>
	<description>The art of not hitting the ground too hard...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia</title>
		<link>http://www.fearoflanding.com/flying/instrument-rating-unofficial-ground-school/#comment-3641</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fearoflanding.com/misc/instrument-rating-unofficial-ground-school/#comment-3641</guid>
		<description>Exactly. I vehemently disagree. :)

I think to a large extent it is a UK issue, in Spain it's true I can go ages without talking to someone. It makes me nervous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. I vehemently disagree. :)</p>
<p>I think to a large extent it is a UK issue, in Spain it&#8217;s true I can go ages without talking to someone. It makes me nervous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob...</title>
		<link>http://www.fearoflanding.com/flying/instrument-rating-unofficial-ground-school/#comment-3473</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fearoflanding.com/misc/instrument-rating-unofficial-ground-school/#comment-3473</guid>
		<description>But apparently one of the "cons" of IFR is higher workload!

Regards,

Rob...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But apparently one of the &#8220;cons&#8221; of IFR is higher workload!</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Rob&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia</title>
		<link>http://www.fearoflanding.com/flying/instrument-rating-unofficial-ground-school/#comment-3472</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fearoflanding.com/misc/instrument-rating-unofficial-ground-school/#comment-3472</guid>
		<description>No, just there is less impetus to do it if I don't specifically want to use it. Cliff rarely flies VFR (because it's a higher workload!) and currently we tend to split flights between us by type.

A common reason to do the IFR rating is to be less weather dependent (you can fly through cloud) but as Cliff can take over, it's not that big a deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, just there is less impetus to do it if I don&#8217;t specifically want to use it. Cliff rarely flies VFR (because it&#8217;s a higher workload!) and currently we tend to split flights between us by type.</p>
<p>A common reason to do the IFR rating is to be less weather dependent (you can fly through cloud) but as Cliff can take over, it&#8217;s not that big a deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob...</title>
		<link>http://www.fearoflanding.com/flying/instrument-rating-unofficial-ground-school/#comment-3469</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 05:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fearoflanding.com/misc/instrument-rating-unofficial-ground-school/#comment-3469</guid>
		<description>So, when you have IFR rating, you can no longer fly under VFR?

Rob...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, when you have IFR rating, you can no longer fly under VFR?</p>
<p>Rob&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
